- Roman Fomin
Modeling Athletes' Training Process - Boris Sobolev
Causal Attribution of Mortality to Delays in Heart Surgery - Aebischer, Tatman, Hepler, & Tractenberg
Engineering Knowledge for Bayesian Networks - Charles Hammerslough
Using Bayes Networks to Estimate Return on Marketing Investment - Steven Wilson
Use of causal modeling with Bayesian networks to inform policy options for sustainable resource management - Bob Wood & Toshi Yumoto
Using Bayes Nets for Market Share Driver Analyses - Cory Hutchinson
Analyzing Injury Levels with Bayesian Networks - Sri Srikanth & Corey Sykes
Driving Digital Customer Engagement Powered by Bayesian Networks - Floyd Demmon
Supervised Learning to Understand Root Causes of Steelmaking Slivers Using BayesiaLab - Benoit Hubert
Optimization of Real-Time Experience Measurement with Bayesian Networks - Asim Zia
Machine learning how human risk perceptions shape behavior - Neeraj Kulkarni
Demystifying the Consumer Decision Journey
Recent Clients
Presentation on September 29, 2016, at the 4th Annual BayesiaLab Conference:
Engineering Knowledge for Bayesian Networks
David Aebischer
Chief of Special Projects, US Army Communications Electronics Command (CECOM), Training Support Division (TSD)
Dr. Joseph Tatman
Vice President and Chief Technical Officer, Innovative Decisions, Inc.
Dr. Amanda Hepler
Senior Analyst, Innovative Decisions, Inc.
Dr. Rochelle Tractenberg
Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Georgetown University
Abstract
In both the theory and practice of Bayesian Networks, assumptions – expert knowledge about any specific problem domain – are a necessary component. Data alone cannot give us the explanatory power we need to do causal inference. Experts help us find the nexus between theoretical and experiential knowledge and help us represent it such as to be qualitatively and quantitatively precise. But it is inherently difficult for experts to explain what they know, and equally difficult for non-experts to understand what experts are saying. What is needed is a formalism for bridging the gap between experts and non-experts and successfully codifying complex technical concepts into graphical structure and probability distributions.
In this presentation we discuss the Define, Structure, Elicit, Verify (DSEV) model for knowledge engineering. DSEV provides a framework for a robust Operations Research-based approach to extracting knowledge and building Bayesian Networks. We outline the methods we use to execute each phase of the model and demonstrate how it is flexible and scalable to different problem domains.