Causal Inference in Marketing Science: Media Mix Modeling and Optimization with Bayesian Networks
Recorded on April 6, 2018.
- Presentation Slides (PDF, 31 MB)
- Data File for Simpson's Paradox (CSV)
- Bayesian Network Model for Simpson's Paradox (XBL)
- Data File for Marketing Mix Model (CSV)
- Bayesian Network Model for Marketing Mix Optimization (XBL)
It is a fallacy to believe that Big Data and Artificial Intelligence alone can produce models that are suitable for media mix optimization. Why? Media mix optimization is a fundamentally causal question, and even the most sophisticated predictive models cannot correctly compute the causal effect of marketing actions. In the first part of our webinar, we present Simpson's Paradox to illustrate this challenge.
Media mix models based on Bayesian networks do not automatically overcome this issue. However, Bayesian networks allow us to directly encode causal assumptions from expert knowledge. With that, we can correctly estimate the causal effect of marketing efforts from historical data, and for simple domains that's adequate. For real-world problems, potentially involving dozens or hundreds of marketing-related variables, encoding expert assumptions is no longer realistic, though.
The second part of the webinar focuses on such a scenario, and we use BayesiaLab to machine-learn a high-dimensional Bayesian network model from available historical advertising and sales data. Additionally, we take advantage of the Disjunctive Cause Criterion for identifying the relevant confounders in our model. As a result, we can perform causal inference and compute the direct effects of each marketing driver on the target variable, i.e., daily sales. With this causal model, we proceed to media mix optimization and employ BayesiaLab's built-in genetic algorithm, taking into account cost functions and potential synergies between channels.
In the final part of the webinar, we extend our model to a dynamic Bayesian network with BayesiaLab's Temporalization function. The machine-learned lag structure now captures the dynamic nature of marketing initiatives, and we repeat the optimization process to generate a recommendation for the media mix that maximizes sales within a given marketing budget.
|December 10–12, 2019||New York, NY, USA||3-Day Introductory Course|
|February 5–7, 2020||Singapore||3-Day Introductory Course|
|February 10–12, 2020||Sydney, NSW, Australia||3-Day Introductory Course|
|March 3–5, 2020||Dubai, UAE||3-Day Introductory Course|
|March 9–11, 2020||Dubai, UAE||3-Day Advanced Course|
|March 24–26, 2020||Boston, MA, USA||3-Day Introductory Course|
|April 7–9, 2020||Paris, France||3-Day Introductory Course|
|May 6–8, 2020||Seattle, WA, USA||3-Day Introductory Course|
|May 11–13, 2020||Seattle, WA, USA||3-Day Advanced Course|
|June 15–17, 2020||Paris, France||3-Day Advanced Course|
|October 5–7, 2020||Toronto, ON, Canada||3-Day Introductory Course|
|October 13–15, 2020||Toronto, ON, Canada||3-Day Advanced Course|
Seminars, Webinars, and Conferences
|December 12, 2019
2 p.m. – 5 p.m. (EST, UTC-05)
|Free Seminar in New York, NY||Artificial Intelligence for Judicial Reasoning|
|January 21, 2020
2 p.m. – 5 p.m. (EST, UTC-05)
|Free Seminar in Washington, DC||Artificial Intelligence for Judicial Reasoning|
|January 28, 2020, 11 a.m. – 12 p.m. (CST, UTC-06)||Live Webinar||Bayesian Parameter Estimation for Individualized Drug Dosing|
|January 30, 2020
2 p.m. – 5 p.m. (CST, UTC-06)
|Free Seminar in Chicago, IL||Artificial Intelligence for Judicial Reasoning|
|Please check out our archive of recordings of previous events.|